Lesion catalogue

Browse Atlas

Lesion / Fibro-osseous & cemento-osseous lesions

Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia

Updated 2026-07-27 Suggest an edit

Overview and definition

Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia (FCOD) is a benign, non-neoplastic fibro-osseous condition in which normal alveolar bone is progressively replaced by fibrous connective tissue containing mineralized material composed of woven bone and dense acellular cementum.[1][2] It is the most extensive clinico-radiologic pattern within the spectrum of cemento-osseous dysplasias (CODs), distinguished by multifocal involvement of two or more jaw quadrants, characteristically in a bilateral and symmetric distribution.[1][2] The condition is thought to arise from elements of the periodontal ligament, though its precise pathogenesis remains incompletely understood.[1][2] Recent molecular studies have identified activating mutations in the RAS-MAPK signaling pathway (BRAF, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, FGFR3) in a subset of sporadic COD cases.[3] FCOD carries no risk of malignant transformation.[2]

The signature radiographic pattern consists of multiple lobulated radiopaque masses with peripheral radiolucent borders confined to the tooth-bearing or formerly tooth-bearing alveolar bone.[1][2] Because the dysplastic bone is hypovascular, biopsy and surgical intervention should be avoided in uncomplicated cases; management centers on periodic clinical and radiographic surveillance.[1][4]

Terminology and classification

The WHO classification of head and neck tumours places this entity within the group of fibro-osseous lesions distinctive to the jaws.[5] Three clinico-radiologic subtypes of osseous dysplasia are recognized: periapical, focal, and florid.[2] The WHO-preferred umbrella term is "osseous dysplasia," though "cemento-osseous dysplasia" remains widely used and accepted in clinical practice.[1][2]

  • Current accepted names: florid osseous dysplasia (FOD), florid cemento-osseous dysplasia (FCOD)
  • Obsolete or superseded terms: florid cemental dysplasia, gigantiform cementoma (now reserved for the distinct familial/hereditary entity), sclerotic cemental masses, multiple cemento-ossifying fibromas (historically applied to familial cases)[2][6]

Familial gigantiform cementoma and gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia are separate hereditary entities linked to ANO5 mutations and should not be conflated with sporadic FCOD, despite overlapping jaw findings.[5][7]

Epidemiology

  • Sex: overwhelming female predominance[2][8]
  • Age: typically diagnosed in the fourth to fifth decades of life[4][8]
  • Ancestry: strong predilection for women of African or Asian descent; occurrence in Caucasian populations is documented but uncommon[2][4]
  • Distribution: the mandible is invariably involved; the maxilla is affected in roughly two-thirds of cases. Lesions are confined to the alveolar process of tooth-bearing or edentulous regions and must involve more than one sextant to qualify as florid[1][2]
  • Inheritance: the vast majority of cases are sporadic; rare autosomal dominant familial forms have been reported[1][6]

Clinical presentation

Presentation

FCOD is characteristically asymptomatic and discovered incidentally on routine dental radiographs or imaging obtained for unrelated indications.[1][4] Associated teeth are vital and respond normally to pulp sensitivity testing, a critical finding that distinguishes FCOD from periapical inflammatory disease.[9]

Symptoms and complications

  • Pain and swelling occur when secondary infection supervenes, typically following tooth extraction, advanced periodontitis, or mucosal perforation by exposed sequestra.[2][4]
  • Osteomyelitis is the most clinically significant complication. The avascular, densely mineralized dysplastic bone is poorly penetrated by antibiotics and highly susceptible to chronic infection, fistula formation, and sequestration once exposed to oral flora.[2][4][10]
  • Simple (traumatic) bone cysts are an established association, reported in roughly 13% of COD cases in one large series. These cysts may undergo periods of growth, stabilization, and regression.[2][8][11]

Red flags

New-onset pain, swelling, draining fistula, or exposed bone in a patient with known FCOD should prompt evaluation for superimposed osteomyelitis or pathologic fracture.[10][12]

Radiographic findings

Location and distribution

Lesions are confined to the alveolar bone of tooth-bearing or formerly tooth-bearing regions, characteristically involving two or more quadrants in a bilateral, often symmetric pattern.[1][2] The mandibular posterior segments are most consistently affected; maxillary involvement accompanies mandibular disease in the majority of cases.[2] Anterior mandibular teeth may show concurrent periapical osseous dysplasia-type changes.[2]

Relationship to teeth and the alveolar process

Lesions center on the periapical regions of teeth or the corresponding edentulous alveolar ridge.[1][9] All affected teeth characteristically show a discontinuous lamina dura and non-uniform periodontal ligament space on cross-sectional imaging.[13] In edentulous patients, the dysplastic masses persist in the alveolar ridges despite the absence of teeth.[14]

Periphery and shape

Mature lesions are typically well-defined, lobulated radiopaque masses surrounded by a thin radiolucent border (fibrous capsule), which is in turn often bounded by a sclerotic rim.[2][4] In earlier or mixed-stage disease, borders may be less well-defined.[2] Individual masses are round to lobulated and may coalesce into large, irregularly shaped sclerotic conglomerates.[2]

Internal architecture

The internal pattern reflects the maturation stage of the dysplastic process:[9]

  • Early (osteolytic) phase: predominantly radiolucent lesions centered at the root apices, easily mistaken for periapical inflammatory pathology
  • Intermediate (cementoblastic) phase: mixed radiolucent-radiopaque pattern with developing internal calcifications
  • Late (osteogenic/mature) phase: densely radiopaque, lobulated masses with minimal residual radiolucency

Most cases present with a mixture of stages across different sites, producing the characteristic panoramic appearance of widespread mixed-to-radiopaque masses.[1][8] Dense, cementum-like radiopacities predominate in the majority of diagnosed cases.[8]

Effects on teeth and adjacent structures

  • Root resorption is observed in a minority of affected teeth; one CBCT-based study found resorption in approximately 18% of teeth associated with COD lesions.[13]
  • Tooth displacement is uncommon.[13]
  • Cortical bone changes: thinning, expansion, and perforation of the buccal, lingual, or inferior cortex are common findings on cross-sectional imaging, more frequent than previously appreciated on conventional radiographs alone. Extensive lesions may cause inferior displacement of the mandibular canal.[2][13]
  • Maxillary sinus: displacement or perforation of the sinus floor is occasionally seen with maxillary lesions.[13]

Growth pattern and extent

FCOD is a slowly progressive condition that tends to stabilize over time.[4] Lesions are characteristically non-expansile or minimally expansile on conventional radiographs, though cross-sectional imaging reveals cortical expansion more frequently than panoramic radiographs suggest.[1][13]

Associated findings

  • Simple bone cysts appear as well-defined radiolucent zones adjacent to or within the sclerotic masses. They are an important recognized association and should not be mistaken for a new aggressive process.[2][11]
  • Superimposed osteomyelitis produces areas of cortical lysis, periosteal reaction, sequestra formation, and ill-defined sclerosis superimposed on the characteristic FCOD pattern.[10][12]

Other imaging findings

Nuclear medicine (bone scintigraphy / SPECT-CT)

FCOD demonstrates multifocal intense radiotracer uptake on bone scintigraphy corresponding to the sclerotic periapical masses.[15] This appearance may mimic metastatic disease or Paget disease on planar images. Correlation with the CT component of SPECT/CT reveals the characteristic periapical sclerotic lesions confined to the alveolar bone, allowing confident differentiation.[15] Awareness of this scintigraphic pattern prevents unnecessary oncologic workup when FCOD is encountered incidentally on bone scans obtained for other indications.

Differential diagnosis

The multifocal, bilateral, predominantly radiopaque pattern of mature FCOD in a middle-aged woman of African or Asian descent is often sufficiently characteristic for a clinico-radiologic diagnosis. Diagnostic difficulty arises in early-stage disease (predominantly radiolucent), atypical demographics, or when superimposed infection obscures the underlying pattern.

EntityWhy it is consideredBest discriminator
Paget disease of the jawBilateral mixed-to-sclerotic jaw changes with cotton-wool radiopacitiesFCOD is confined to the alveolar bone with normal serum alkaline phosphatase; Paget disease involves the entire bone, causes generalized enlargement, hypercementosis, and loss of lamina dura, and typically elevates serum alkaline phosphatase[1][16]
Fibrous dysplasiaExpansile mixed-density jaw lesion with ground-glass internal patternFibrous dysplasia is characteristically unilateral with ill-defined blending into normal bone and ground-glass density; FCOD is multifocal, bilateral, and confined to the alveolar process with lobulated dense masses[1][17]
Chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitisDiffuse mandibular sclerosis with pain and swellingSclerosing osteomyelitis presents with pain, soft-tissue swelling, periosteal reaction, and cortical lysis; FCOD is asymptomatic unless secondarily infected and lacks periosteal new bone formation[10][18]
Cemento-ossifying fibromaWell-defined mixed-density jaw mass with centrifugal growthCemento-ossifying fibroma is typically solitary, well-encapsulated, causes downward displacement of the inferior alveolar canal, and shows progressive growth requiring excision; FCOD is multifocal, bilateral, and self-limiting[1][19][20]

The highest-risk diagnostic pitfall is misidentifying early-stage FCOD as multiple periapical inflammatory lesions, leading to unnecessary endodontic treatment or extraction that exposes hypovascular bone to infection.[1][9] Pulp vitality testing of associated teeth is the single most important discriminating step; vital teeth exclude an endodontic etiology. When Paget disease is a consideration, serum alkaline phosphatase measurement readily distinguishes the two conditions.[16]

Histopathology

Biopsy is not routinely indicated and should be avoided in uncomplicated FCOD because it risks introducing oral pathogens into hypovascular tissue.[1][2] When tissue is obtained—typically from cases complicated by infection or when the diagnosis is uncertain—the histologic features are identical across all COD subtypes.[2]

Microscopic findings

  • Fibrous stroma: variably cellular fibrous connective tissue that is well-vascularized in early lesions and progressively hypocellular and avascular in mature lesions[2]
  • Mineralized component: a mixture of irregularly shaped woven bony trabeculae (often curvilinear, described as "ginger root" pattern) and spherules of dense acellular cementum-like material. Bony trabeculae characteristically lack osteoblastic rimming.[1][2][19]
  • Maturation sequence: early lesions show scanty calcified material within cellular fibrous tissue; intermediate lesions contain increasing amounts of mixed bone and cementum; mature lesions consist of coalesced, relatively acellular and avascular sheets of lamellar bone and cementum-like tissue with minimal residual stroma[2]
  • Inflammation is absent in uncomplicated lesions; its presence indicates superimposed infection[2]

Radiologic-pathologic correlation

The progressive mineralization seen histologically directly corresponds to the radiographic transition from radiolucent (early) through mixed (intermediate) to densely radiopaque (mature).[2][9]

Molecular findings

Activating mutations in the RAS-MAPK pathway (BRAF, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, FGFR3) have been identified in approximately 28% of evaluable sporadic COD samples.[3] A NOTCH4 mutation has also been reported, expanding the known molecular landscape.[19] Familial forms of florid COD, familial gigantiform cementoma, and gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia share heterozygous ANO5 mutations, supporting a distinct hereditary pathway.[5][7] These molecular findings do not yet alter routine clinical management but may eventually improve discrimination from cemento-ossifying fibroma.[3][19]

Management and prognosis

Uncomplicated FCOD

  • No treatment is required. The diagnosis is established by clinico-radiologic correlation; biopsy should be avoided.[1][2][4]
  • Long-term periodic clinical and radiographic surveillance is recommended to monitor for interval change, secondary infection, or simple bone cyst development.[4][21]
  • Patients should maintain meticulous oral hygiene to minimize the risk of odontogenic infection and the consequent need for extraction.[2][4]
  • Prosthetic planning should account for the risk of mucosal breakdown over superficial dysplastic masses; ill-fitting dentures may precipitate exposure and infection.[14]
  • Dental implant placement in affected areas carries an elevated risk of failure due to poor osteointegration in the avascular dysplastic bone.[2]

Complicated FCOD (secondary infection / osteomyelitis)

  • Surgical curettage of necrotic and sequestrated bone is indicated, with wound closure using local soft-tissue flaps (e.g., buccal fat pad).[22]
  • Antibiotic penetration into the avascular dysplastic bone is limited, making surgical debridement the primary therapeutic intervention.[4][22]
  • Severe cases with extensive sequestration may require segmental resection and reconstruction with plate fixation.[12]

Simple bone cyst association

  • Surgical exploration with curettage and stimulation of bleeding into the cavity is the standard approach; complete or partial healing is achieved in the majority of cases, though recurrence has been reported.[11]

Prognosis

FCOD carries no risk of malignant transformation.[2] Uncomplicated lesions tend to stabilize and remain clinically and radiographically stable over years of follow-up.[4] The principal long-term risk is secondary osteomyelitis, which can produce a protracted and morbid clinical course if the dysplastic bone is violated by infection, extraction, or surgical intervention.[1][2]

Special considerations

Familial forms

Rare autosomal dominant familial florid cemento-osseous dysplasia has been linked to heterozygous ANO5 mutations, the same gene implicated in gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia and familial gigantiform cementoma.[5][6][7] Familial cases may present at a younger age and with more pronounced jaw expansion than sporadic FCOD.[6] When a familial pattern is suspected, genetic counseling and evaluation for extracranial skeletal manifestations (bone fragility, diaphyseal sclerosis of long bones) should be considered to exclude gnathodiaphyseal dysplasia.[23][24]

ORAD reference data

Radiographic characteristics

18 characteristics

Banded distributions from the ORAD reference database.

Clinical Features

What is the sex of your patient? Female · usually
What is the sex of your patient?
FindingFrequency
Male rarely
Female usually
Unknown rarely
What is the race of your patient? Black · usually
What is the race of your patient?
FindingFrequency
Black usually
Nonblack sometimes
Unknown rarely
What is the age of your patient? 26 - 50 · commonly
What is the age of your patient?
FindingFrequency
0 - 10 not reported
11 - 25 occasionally
26 - 50 commonly
50 + sometimes
Unknown rarely
Does your patient have pain or paresthesia? No pain · usually
Does your patient have pain or paresthesia?
FindingFrequency
Pain sometimes
No pain usually
Unknown rarely

Radiographic Features

Which jaw contains the lesion? Both jaws · commonly
Which jaw contains the lesion?
FindingFrequency
Maxilla only not reported
Mandible only sometimes
Both jaws commonly
The lesion center is in what region ? Molar region · commonly
The lesion center is in what region ?
FindingFrequency
Incisor region occasionally
Canine/Premolar Region sometimes
Molar region commonly
Ramus region occasionally
TMJ region not reported
Sinus region rarely
The relationship of the lesion to teeth is: Apex associated · commonly
The relationship of the lesion to teeth is:
FindingFrequency
Crown associated not reported
Root associated occasionally
Apex associated commonly
Missing tooth associated occasionally
Not tooth associated sometimes
Is the tooth associated with the lesion vital? Vital · usually
Is the tooth associated with the lesion vital?
FindingFrequency
Vital usually
Not vital rarely
Unknown rarely
Please estimate the number of lesions: Three or more · usually
Please estimate the number of lesions:
FindingFrequency
One not reported
Two not reported
Three or more usually
Generalized sometimes
What is the maximum size of the lesion? Greater than 3 cm · sometimes
What is the maximum size of the lesion?
FindingFrequency
Less than 2 cm sometimes
2 to 3 cm sometimes
Greater than 3 cm sometimes
Where is the origin of the lesion? Central · usually
Where is the origin of the lesion?
FindingFrequency
Central usually
Peripheral not reported
The borders of the lesion are: Corticated · usually
The borders of the lesion are:
FindingFrequency
Corticated usually
Defined but not corticated sometimes
Diffuse occasionally
The loculation of the lesion is: Not loculated · usually
The loculation of the lesion is:
FindingFrequency
Unilocular sometimes
Multilocular occasionally
Not loculated usually
The contents of the lesions are: Mixed · commonly
The contents of the lesions are:
FindingFrequency
Radiolucent occasionally
Radiopaque sometimes
Mixed commonly
Radiolucent with flecks sometimes
Does the lesion contain one or more teeth ? Yes · commonly
Does the lesion contain one or more teeth ?
FindingFrequency
Yes commonly
No commonly
Unknown rarely
Does the lesion expand the bony cortex? No · usually
Does the lesion expand the bony cortex?
FindingFrequency
Yes sometimes
No usually
Does the lesion cause root resorption ? No · usually
Does the lesion cause root resorption ?
FindingFrequency
Yes sometimes
No usually
Does the lesion cause tooth displacement or impaction? No · usually
Does the lesion cause tooth displacement or impaction?
FindingFrequency
Yes rarely
No usually
Atlas sources

References

24 sources
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
    Osseous (Cemento-Osseous) Dysplasia of the Jaws: Clinical and Radiographic Analysis. Alsufyani NA, Lam EW. Journal (Canadian Dental Association). 2011;77:b70.
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
    Benign Lesions of the Oral Cavity and the Jaws. A. Ross Kerr, Denise A. Trochesset. Chapter 6.
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
    ANO5-Related Muscle Disease. Palmio J, Penttilä S, Jokela M. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Updated 2025 May 15.
  24. 24

Build an interactive differential →

Nearest neighbours

Expand to full map ↗

This lesion (ringed) among its most radiographically similar entries. Region and origin must overlap, so every neighbour is a genuine differential.

Drag to explore · Ctrl/⌘ + scroll to zoom · click a neighbour to recentre

← All lesions